By Uchenna Ezeadigwe
In a developing controversy within Nigeria’s academic sphere, two organizations have come forward to defend Professor Bernard Odoh against allegations made by the Federal University Gusau (FUG) regarding his employment and professorial status.
Both YOHESOR-NGO and the Concerned Members of Academia (CMA) Southeast have issued strong statements supporting Professor Odoh’s legitimacy and calling for an investigation into the matter.
YOHESOR, a youth-focused NGO, released detailed findings from what they describe as a “thorough independent investigation” that supports Professor Odoh’s legitimate appointment and subsequent activities at the university. According to their statement dated November 22, 2024, they have uncovered “irrefutable evidence and documents” confirming the legitimacy of Odoh’s appointment, promotion, and academic activities.
The NGO outlined four key points defending Professor Odoh’s position: his lawful employment in the Department of Geological Sciences, his promotion to professorship following evaluations by external assessors, his approved leave of absence to serve in Ebonyi State Government, and verified salary payment records extending to 2015.
Simultaneously, CMA Southeast has challenged the university’s allegations, characterizing them as “unfounded and malicious.” Their statement emphasizes that Professor Odoh’s appointment was processed through proper institutional channels and complied with national academic protocols. The statement signed on behalfalf of the group by Dr. Cyril Okorocha and Dr. Emeka Ezeh noted that the controversy has raised broader questions about institutional integrity in Nigeria’s higher education system. Both organizations warn that the allegations could have far-reaching implications for the credibility of Nigerian universities and their graduates.
“This issue transcends Professor Odoh,” states YOHESOR’s document. “It is about preserving the sanctity of our educational system.” The organization argues that the allegations risk undermining public confidence in the management of federal institutions.
CMA Southeast has announced its readiness to support Professor Odoh in pursuing legal action to defend his academic reputation. They have also called for an independent, transparent investigation into the matter.
The case has sparked debate about administrative accountability in Nigerian universities, with both organizations questioning the timing and motivation behind the Registrar’s allegations. YOHESOR has specifically challenged the university to explain how it justified consistent salary payments to Professor Odoh if his employment was indeed fraudulent, as alleged.
Both organizations have called for immediate intervention by relevant authorities to investigate the matter thoroughly. They argue that the implications extend beyond individual reputation to affect the broader credibility of Nigeria’s higher education system.
The Federal University Gusau has not yet responded to these latest developments. The situation continues to evolve as stakeholders await the university’s official response to these counterstatements and the potential commencement of an independent investigation.
